Public conference visits Thu Jul 1 00:00:06 2004 through Wed Jul 7 23:59:57 2004 1. 5524 news 11. 1770 macintosh 21. 1077 words 2. 5064 media 12. 1657 sports 22. 1068 krakhaus.ind 3. 3168 flame.ind 13. 1625 sanfran 23. 963 berkeley 4. 3146 genx 14. 1617 books 24. 945 decor 5. 3137 movies 15. 1578 obsess 25. 900 newmusic 6. 3028 tv 16. 1513 plumage 26. 899 windows 7. 2862 popcult 17. 1492 music 27. 848 cars 8. 2105 politics 18. 1244 ny 28. 843 hosts 9. 2069 chow.ind 19. 1164 web 29. 797 travel 10. 1972 current 20. 1122 health 30. 764 gd
I wonder how proud Salon Media Group is about flame being #3. (I wonder if Salon Media Group knows?)
Addendum:
One of the ugly side-effects of bozo-filtering (configuring The WELL so it automatically skips over postings by users you don't wish to read) is that given the rise of flame.ind, and the corresponding rise in the use of bozofiltering, more and more discussions get sidetracked by the fact that people who are bozofiltering an individual start commenting on the automatic filtering, rather than on the topic at hand.
For instance, right now in the News conference, someone brought up the fact that Tom Ridge has come out with another terror warning and the subsequent talk is all about crying wolf. One regularly-bozofiltered individual (whose three-letter name ends in 'x' and, shall we say, whose name would win lots of points on a triple word score in Scrabble) inserted a comment and since then others have come along not to comment on his comment, to comment on the fact that he's bozofiltered. Such behavior doesn't produce anything useful, doesn't add anything to the discussion, and shows how destructive the whole bozofiltering practice has become.
I wonder what would happen if bozofiltering were to become completely private: no longer could you share the list of names you're ignoring, and no longer would the automated utility that goes around scanning for any changes to bozo lists work. People should have the ability to filter who they choose, but would it be any great loss to the community if the community didn't know on an individual level who was ignoring who?
Posted by brian at July 8, 2004 12:01 AM